Book

Oliver cavity used a Logical court making the reader to think ab come in the case by his/ her reason and trying to convince the reader and to clarify that whatever Inside the soul will motivate he/she in either ways skillful or evil It is likely that, whether they had chatn Natural Born Killers or The colour Berets or a Tom and Jerry cartoon the night before their original crime, Ben and Sarah would rent behaved In exactly the way they did. play off logically argued back with a valid point. All teenagers around Hanna 2 the world have seen the photographic film and they werent affected by It like Ben and Sarah ere the problem seems to be in Ben and Sarah, non the cinema. 1 500 hours of mostly blood-red TV programming exponent have slightly more effect on these both youngsters than two hours of Natural born killers? .Ben and Sarah could have neer been affected by a two hours movie and cause them to travail a crime as millions of lot saw the movie and they never hear d nearly psyche who attempted a crime from just watching a untamed movie, as Natural born killers was non and wont be the last violent movie. The whole problem comes from the inner of Bens and Sarahs, both of them had a bountiful support where the family was not there nor taking argon of them or watching out their teenage children.We back end tell that both of Sarah and Ben came out from a apart(p) and different families where the love bond was not there scarce they did handle similarities in their soulfulnessalities as both of them were drinking, doing drugs and as they dont have any reference of Income purgetually they will need money to continue living Thats what very motivated them to attempt the crimes they did, not the movie. When a person is good and have pure thoughts his/her actions will be good and useful for others too, if that person is not, in all probability his/her actions will hurt others.And that is actually what happened with Ben and Sarah, both of t hem turned to be bad and do evil actions from what they saw In their lives not from what the movie they saw. 1 OFF Using logical compendium was not enough to Oliver Stone clarifying and defending himself against Gresham, therefore he used honest appeal as Stone build up his argument talking about Gresham himself A lawyer in search of a client could see in this an indictment of the entertainment industry and not of the teenage killers and those who reared them.Oliver Stone trying to tell us that a lawyer who is Just flavour for none and does not care about lives and the safety of people is not a person to trust how can you trust a person who doesnt care about people lives and about how those teenagers had been raised up are not a responsible people. As we should care about this genesis whos coming up to this world and help them to be better people for our country not to use them Just to get clients and make just about money, Oliver here is trying to defend himself by blaming Gr esham and everybody whos supporting those youngsters as its not logical that.What can control a person ? A movie or the person himself ? How can Gresham blame a movie for attempting two murders ? Ben and Sarah are eighteen and nineteen years old, they are mature enough to control their actions and its really a childish affaire to blame a movie for motivating them to attempt two murder crimes one each. What gives a man a value than any others organism is the MIND which we can use to control our actions.Hanna 4 If Dan White, the killer of San Francisco supervisor Harvey Milk and mayor George Nosecone, could claim that Twenties made me do it Oliver is continuing using ethical appeals by saying that a person can not do whatever he wants then blame it to other people or things and say that it was not his/her fault as somebody else or something motivated him/her to do a crime.Watching a movie is not the big thing that can motivate you, and if its what about those people who are losing t heir families in the wars, and we never heard about any of them turned to be a murder, as yet us and our friends we all watch horror movies and play violent motion picture games and it never turned us to violent people who can go and kill the others or even Jump into somebody else car and remove it, it is Just because there is no need to do that. But Ben and Sarah had their reasons to attempt the crimes but that is not an excuse to do a crime even when you have reasons.Artists should never be blamed for societal violence in most cases, they are merely holding a mirror up to the reality that already exists or providing catharsis for emotions we are already suppressing. hysteria is there and it does exist in the movies and we can not deny that but one whos watching is the one who decides what to do and how his/her actions will look like. unmatched should use his/her mind before going for an action and then regret it later.