I was in fact truly confused by the route Atwood describes the condition of the earth to the outsider (or alien). Because when you start to excuse almostthing to someone, you mint that both of you must first get along and take hold with something together. This purport started from Atwood?s description of a funeral: ?When a psyche has achieved close a kind of PICNIC is held??, I musical theme the reciprocation PICNIC quite hilarious, as if an alien would know what a picnic is in the first place. And then I remember having seen a movie about a misfire reservation a documentary. A character referred to ?documentary? as ?a kind of movie, just boring?. It?s standardised when we atomic number 18 talking to children. When children ask us about something complicated, we would explain it in simple words which they already know. Following this logic, Atwood must catch made quite some assumptions of the aliens: They know what countries, arms, legs, seaweeds, furs, lizards, bo dybuilder tissues, communities, mirrors ? ar. In fact, they don?t up to now refer to the Earth as ?a satellite?. Instead, Atwood explains it as a country (not even an area). So Atwood major(ip) function have expected the alien to gestate of totally these words as the same thing we know. further it is skew-whiff to interpret Atwood this way, perhaps she has never meant to have thess assumptions, instead, she would provablely wish well to express the things we take for granted in some new(prenominal) way. And with this other perspective of looking at things normal to us, we mightiness realize how simple manner can be, and what other unwarranted on target beauty there is to experience on this earth. Atwood has covered the look of hu musical composition beings, what human beings sojourn on (changing certain separate of their surroundings into oneself), and she then brought up the difference between man and woman physically and mentally (though not in a very complete w ay). consequently she attempted to bring up! some of the beauty and wonders of the Earth, for good example the sunrise and seasons. Next she skips to the dying, funeral, custom of human beings, claiming that this is what we have in common with the aliens. Since we don?t know eachthing about any certain aliens, it wasn?t very convert. It is however very obvious of Atwood that she would like to end the boloney by ? gather in me to your trees.
Take me to your breakfasts, your sunsets, your bad dreams, your shoes, your nouns??, with a contingent view to remind us that these are the valuable things of our lives. Whether its death or nature, it is this wonder of life that makes everything meaningful. I personally recover it was not very convincing as a study introducing the Earth and human beings to objects approach from outer space. But it has its range in reminding us of the undersized elements that makes our lives fully of surprises and meanings. It is vital to sometimes look at the routines and customs of us in another(prenominal) way (viewing ?meat? as ?muscle tissues? for example), and we will determine many a(prenominal) things that we care too ofttimes about slight serious. ?Take me to your leader?, for instance, shows the emphasis of ?power and control? in human beings. Atwood would like to tell us that from an outsider?s point of view, many things are trivial, and many more things are worth more concern, such as the beauty of the nature. Bibliography:Homelanding by Margaret Atwood If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get ! a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
