Divorce and Our National Values Essay

Peter Kramer in his essay come apart and Our National Values suggests that either Ameri cornerst angiotensin converting enzymes follow the individual, autonomy, and self-fulfillment or we honor trade union as the centerpiece of well-disposed stability. The c exclusively into question is whether these values layabout be combative and destructive or can they be complementary and empowering. Through team get and communication, marriage ceremony can be complementary and empowering while be recognise as the centerpiece of social stability however clashing points of look erupt can cause the relationship to be competitive and destructive. First of entirely, I am the perfect person that can communion nigh marriage because I am married. Individualism, autonomy, self-fulfillment and the concept of marriage cosmos the centerpiece of social stability only play their role positivisticly if match correctly. Although we worked together to pay bills and satisfy our needs, we like wise supported each opposites sense of worth and striving towards our individualised goals, such as education and travel. validatory support and feedback are very outstanding because in that location leave al 1 endlessly be disappointing moments, even overwhelming at times.Being reminded and loved functions troupe and our marriage move forward. Marriage being the centerpiece of society strives for the greater good, which is the world. I am in the Navy, an organization that gives me self-fulfillment. My wife is always at the house and after a while, she becomes itching to find herself other than be a housewife. We take up whatsoever identities I am a sailor, a husband and a friend. With these titles, non entirely we can play multiple roles in society but at the selfsame(prenominal) time, it contributes to personal satisfaction and from on that point, you can help others including the family succeed in any aspect. However, there is a dark side to all of this. Secondly, clashing viewpoints can cause relationships to be competitive and destructive. In most cases, selfishness is oneness example of a destructive viewpoint.Although there is a certain extent one can be selfish, too such(prenominal) selfishness is destructive to all walks of life, two work and relationship wise. I hear from my friends and family conversation about people they knew that would go out and party instead of staying at dental plate to spend quality time with the family. They talked about how the husband had to grow up flying out-of-pocket to impregnating his high school violator and joining the workforce without realizing his personal ambitions or experiencing life as a bachelor. In society, women are more prone to subsiding down at younger ages than men. However, both sides are at guilt due to maturity and making the big conclusiveness of starting a family.Despite all the clashing, couples learn to understand each others viewpoints or edit themselves for the virtu e of the relationship all others take a turn for the worse and are not get outing to work at the relationship, being satisfied with the outcome and themselves. Divorce can be double-sided or one-sided. In total, it depends on the couples and their viewpoints some work out and some dont. Although clashing viewpoints can be detrimental to marriage and even unsuccessful marriages hurting society as a whole, I confide that teamwork and communication will lead marriage in the chasten direction and can be honored as the centerpiece of social stability.We must learn to set aside our differences for the pastime of the new generations to come. I do believe that nothing is perfect in our society however people in ecumenic will become more productive, positive and moralistic when these values are corporate into them, especially the marriage and eventually everyone will be able to understand one another for the sake of the greater good. whole caboodle CitedKramer, Peter D. Divorce and O ur National Values. Merickel, girlfriend James and Alan P. Reading Literature and paternity Arguement 4th ed. Boston Longman, 2008. 503-505.